Very Interesting

I've heard back from Family Genetics, Ltd., the UK company that John's, #106, results were from.    A prompt and informative reply.    They gave me a nomenclature change for one of the markers so I made the correction and ran a distance table again, this time for only the Hg I1a's in the Project.    Much more interesting -Now he 'seems' to match the Augusta/Washington Co. Berrys!    It would be nice if some of those missing markers could be tested.    As it is, we're really only comparing 21 common markers with most of the group, and all 26 only with ##7, 27, 90 and 102 where the match doesn't look so good.

Even more news!    Donald's, #103, sample has arrive back at FTDNA from Scotland.    It should go to the lab tomorrow evening.